<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RapidTax Blog &#187; 2009 &#187; August</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2009/08/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tax news, personal finance, and more!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>2008 Tax Extension Form: The Deadline is Approaching</title>
		<link>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2008-tax-extension-form-the-deadline-is-approaching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2008-tax-extension-form-the-deadline-is-approaching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tax News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2008 extension form]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2008 tax extension form]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tax extension form]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For many taxpayers, the 2008 tax deadline was on April 15th, 2009. But for taxpayers who filed a 2008 extension, there&#8217;s another deadline looming: they need their returns filed by October 15th, 2009. A few steps they can take to make sure everything goes well:


Make sure you&#8217;ve actually filed a 2008 income tax extension: many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many taxpayers, the 2008 tax deadline was on April 15th, 2009. But for taxpayers who filed a 2008 extension, there&#8217;s another deadline looming: they need their returns filed by October 15th, 2009. A few steps they can take to make sure everything goes well:<span id="more-111"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Make sure you&#8217;ve actually filed a 2008 income tax extension:</strong> many taxpayers end up owing extra fees because they didn&#8217;t complete their 2008 tax extension form filing. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Make sure you&#8217;re aware of the penalties:</strong> even if you filed a 2008 tax extension, you&#8217;re still going to owe money when you pay late. Fortunately, the penalties for <em>paying</em> late are much lower than the penalties for <em>filing</em> late. You&#8217;ll owe .5% of your total bill for each month you&#8217;re late. You&#8217;ll also have to pay 5% per year in interest&mdash;steep, but much lower than the <em>5% per month</em> you could owe if you file late, too.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t forget about state taxes:</strong> If you&#8217;ve filed your federal tax extension form, but not your California income tax extension, you could be on the hook for fines from the state. If you&#8217;re in the military, tax extensions can get even more complicated, because you may serve in different states&mdash;but it&#8217;s fairly simple to sort out, since the paperwork is all available.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Gather your tax forms</strong>: you don&#8217;t want to come up short when it&#8217;s time to actually complete the filing. If you&#8217;re unable to get the forms, make some plans in advance: you&#8217;ll have to estimate your income and withholdings, and the IRS may end up questioning the estimates. It can get fairly complicated, so it&#8217;s best to avoid the trouble and track down your forms.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Double- and triple-check your work:</strong> the IRS is always picky about errors&mdash;but if you filed a 2008 tax extension, they&#8217;re going to pay extra attention. You might know how long the tax extension does last, but you don&#8217;t know how long those errors will stick around. This isn&#8217;t because they want to pick on late filers, or even because people who file late make more errors. The reason is simple: they&#8217;re less busy when it&#8217;s not tax season, so they have more time to carefully examine your return. So spend some extra time reading over your 1040; extension filing won&#8217;t help you there.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>The good news? Although it used to be difficult, filing after the deadline once you file a 2008 tax extension form has never been easier. You can efile (an electronic file extension) online, and have your credits automatically calculated. It&#8217;s faster and simpler than a traditional return, and could help you get even more money back! And even if you expect to owe money, you don&#8217;t have to pay until you&#8217;ve completed the filing (so you can wait until you know how much you&#8217;re saving&mdash;it amounts to getting to file for free!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2008-tax-extension-form-the-deadline-is-approaching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is The Federal Earned Income Tax Credit a Good Avenue for Stimulus Payments?</title>
		<link>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/is-the-federal-earned-income-tax-credit-a-good-avenue-for-stimulus-payments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/is-the-federal-earned-income-tax-credit-a-good-avenue-for-stimulus-payments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Credits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[federal earned income tax credit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was designed to get the economy moving again by getting people to spend money. It&#8217;s off to a slow start, because most of what the plan calls for is new spending: new infrastructure projects, new subsidies for alternative fuels, new educational stimulus money, and more local handouts. But there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was designed to get the economy moving again by getting people to spend money. It&#8217;s off to a slow start, because most of what the plan calls for is new spending: new infrastructure projects, new subsidies for alternative fuels, new <a href="http://www.collegewithinreach.com/SocMe/?Title=The+Stimulus+Bill+and+College+Savings&amp;id=1294&amp;pid=680&amp;sid=775&amp;tid=1294">educational stimulus money</a>, and more local handouts. But there&#8217;s already a &#8220;stimulus&#8221; plan in place that can handle all that, and more!<span id="more-108"></span></p>
<p>The Federal earned income tax credit gives money to low-income workers, to compensate them for payroll taxes. Since there was already a payroll tax cut in an earlier stimulus plan, why not just boost the Federal earned income tax credit?</p>
<p>There are a few reasons the earned income tax credit hasn&#8217;t been expanded:</p>
<ul>
<li>It isn&#8217;t targeted. The earned income tax credit doesn&#8217;t necessarily help build new infrastructure, boost home prices, or send people back to school. It may go straight into savings, which is not something stimulus plans generally try to do.</li>
<li>It helps people who are still employed. With the unemployment rate likely to hit 10%, fewer and fewer people will be eligible for a tax credit that pays back payroll taxes. Instead of giving more money to people who are still working, the current stimulus plan tries to do two things: create new jobs, and reduce competition for existing jobs by sending people back to school.</li>
<li>It&#8217;s harder to notice. A one-time credit giving back money that was already paid into the tax system is hard to notice. It sounds like an accounting gimmick, not a benefit (and maybe it is). But, for good reasons or for bad, it&#8217;s easier to notice having extra money if it shows up in a roundabout way, so the federal earned income tax credit doesn&#8217;t get as much attention.</li>
</ul>
<p>The good news? The Federal earned income tax credit is one of the most common tax credits available to filers. <a href="http://www.rapidtax.com/">Find out if you&#8217;re eligible!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/is-the-federal-earned-income-tax-credit-a-good-avenue-for-stimulus-payments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Tax Return Conundrum: With Funding Dropping, How Will Feds Pick up the Slack?</title>
		<link>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2008-tax-return-conundrum-with-funding-dropping-how-will-feds-pick-up-the-slack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2008-tax-return-conundrum-with-funding-dropping-how-will-feds-pick-up-the-slack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tax News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[swiss banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2008 tax return numbers just aren&#8217;t looking good for the government. Year over year revenue has dropped catastrophically, even as spending is up. So how are they making up the shortfall? There&#8217;s been some tentative talk of cost-cutting and income tax hikes, but there are some unusual plans that are also in the works:

Via Phillip [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2008 tax return numbers just aren&#8217;t looking good for the government. Year over year revenue has <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/taxes/2009-05-26-irs-tax-revenue-down_N.htm">dropped catastrophically</a>, even as spending is up. So how are they making up the shortfall? There&#8217;s been some tentative talk of cost-cutting and income tax hikes, but there are some unusual plans that are also in the works:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/phillip/345829246/"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/160/345829246_a7434a76dc.jpg"></a><br />
<em>Via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/phillip/">Phillip</a> on Flickr.</em><br />
<span id="more-103"></span><br />
<strong>Getting information from Swiss banks:</strong> even when they <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/ubs-tax-probe-expands-hong-kong/">aren&#8217;t in Switzerland</a>, these banks are feeling the heat. It may be the single best way to make up for a weak 2008 tax return: collect unpaid taxes on money earned during the good years, instead!</p>
<p><strong>Legalizing in order to tax:</strong> The <em>Washington Post</em> recently published an editorial calling for <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/16/AR2009081601758.html">legalizing and taxing drugs</a>. For a paper that values its connections to the political mainstream, that&#8217;s a significant step. Among other things, they argue that it&#8217;s a dollars-and-cents issue:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Having fought the war on drugs, we know that ending the drug war is the right thing to do &#8212; for all of us, especially taxpayers. While the financial benefits of drug legalization are not our main concern, they are substantial. In a July referendum, Oakland, Calif., voted to tax drug sales by a 4-to-1 margin. Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron estimates that ending the drug war would save $44 billion annually, with taxes bringing in an additional $33 billion.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Finding new things to illegalize and fine:</strong> High-Frequency Trading is a <a href="http://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/a-bestiary-of-algorithmic-trading-strategies/">fiendishly complex subject which is only partly understood, even by PhDs and industry experts</a>. Fortunately, the qualifications for having an opinion on it are a bit lower. One new proposal is a <a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KH19Dj01.html">tax on every trade</a> as a way to partly ban high-frequency trading.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s the plan: tax money overseas, legalize drugs, and create a fine for something nobody really understands.</p>
<p>How much of this will really happen? The answer is, likely, almost none of it: overseas banks have always had to assume that there could be a crackdown, so they&#8217;ve taken precautions to make it hard to get money out. While drug legalization is getting more popular, it&#8217;s hard to beat the status quo. And a trading tax is not likely to get passed any time soon&mdash;if Wall Streeters are already paying income taxes, why kill the golden goose by cutting their incomes in order to tax them a different way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rapidtax.com/blog/index.php/2008-tax-return-conundrum-with-funding-dropping-how-will-feds-pick-up-the-slack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
